Have you also received emails inviting you to take action against raising fuel prices by forcing a price war at the petrol pumps? Apparently, “It is really simple to do!” Just boycott “the two biggest overseas oil companies SHELL and BP (which are now one),” for the rest of the year. We are not being asked to do anything inconvenient like driving less. Instead we are to buy “Local is Lekka - Sasol / Engen / Excel”! If we don’t wimp out and millions of South Africans support the call to boycott the overseas companies, it is claimed that “they will be inclined to reduce their prices and other oil companies will have to follow suit. “
Voting with your wheels! Its great and long overdue in South Africa. I personally believe that the call to drive less and more efficiently (lift clubs, smaller cars etc) should have been added to the action. Isn’t the bottom line the fact that demand for oil is exceeding supply – hence the price increases. More and more people world wide are buying cars and plugging into more and more oil products (plastics, fertilizer etc) at the same time that the existing oil wells are unable to meet the demand, some are drying up and new oil `finds’ are financially and physically less productive.
But to get back to local is lekker and Sasol. Someone help me here!! RSA is not an oil producing land so our fuel from Sasol is derived from coal – a hugely polluting, costly process with a destructive Carbon footprint. Can Sasol produce enough to meet our fuel addiction? Won’t we still have to buy from big overseas companies? I for one am keen to boycott big bad polluters, but I believe that we need to get real and look at being less dependant on fossil fuel rather than simply switching brands.
KimK
2 Comment
Kim, May 17, 2010 at 11:48 pm
Prepare now for a looming oil supply crunch
South Africa has learned the hard way about the consequences of inadequate energy supplies. Since the electricity crisis erupted in January 2008, supply constraints have hobbled our economy’s development. Our leadership urgently needs to take action to avoid a similar looming energy crisis – this time concerning liquid fuels.
Over the past couple of years the world has begun to wake up to the reality of ‘peak oil’: the empirical fact that global oil production will inevitably reach a maximum rate – a peak – and thereafter decline inexorably due to the depletion of this finite resource.
Most of the world’s governments have for decades taken their cues on security of oil supply from the International Energy Agency, which was set up after the 1970s oil shocks. Until recently, the IEA maintained that there was no prospect for oil supply constraints before 2030.
But the IEA’s Chief Economist, Fatih Birol, admitted in an interview with the UK’s Guardian newspaper late in 2008 that he expects conventional oil production to peak by 2020.
In November, a whistleblower from the IEA alleged that the agency knew very well about the threat posed by peak oil, but was under pressure from member governments – chiefly the United States – to keep the issue under wraps out of fear that open acknowledgement would lead to a stock market collapse.
A comprehensive survey of academic research and industry reports on peak oil published last October by the UK’s Energy Research Centre concluded that “there is a significant risk of a peak before 2020”.
A report for the US Department of Energy in 2005 warned that mitigating actions needed to be implemented at least 20 years before the oil peak to avoid serious economic and social dislocations.
The peak and decline will happen at a time when demand for oil is growing very rapidly in many developing economies. China’s oil consumption has leapt from six to nine million barrels per day in the past three years alone.
Because oil exporting countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia have been consuming an increasing share of their oil production, total world oil exports have in fact been declining since 2005 – a major factor underlying the steep rise in international oil prices observed since then.
Until now, most national governments have not publicly acknowledged the threats posed by oil depletion. One exception is Sweden, whose government in 2006 outlined plans to halve the country’s oil consumption by 2020.
And in March this year, the UK’s Energy Minister called a summit with industrialists to discuss his government’s response to a near-term oil peak.
This follows the publication in February of a report entitled “The Oil Crunch” by the UK Industry Taskforce on Peak Oil and Energy Security. The taskforce – whose membership includes Sir Richard Branson, founder of the Virgin Group – stated that “We must plan for a world in which oil prices are likely to be both higher and more volatile and where oil price shocks have the potential to destabilise economic, political and social activity.”
The dramatic price spike in 2008, when oil reached $147 per barrel, was a major contributor to the global economic crisis. The recession dented demand for oil in the industrialised countries and effectively postponed the oil supply crunch for a couple of years, buying the world some precious time to prepare.
Despite the synthetic fuels produced by Sasol and PetroSA from coal and gas, respectively, South Africa imports about 70 per cent of its liquid fuels and is therefore highly exposed to international oil shocks. More than two thirds of oil imports come from the volatile Middle East.
Our transport systems are overwhelmingly reliant on petroleum fuels and accounts for over three quarters of national oil consumption. This dependence is our Achilles heel.
The Department of Transport calls transport “the heartbeat of the economy”. Rising fuel prices lead to higher prices of food and many other goods and services, pushing up the overall rate of inflation and raising the costs of living. Physical shortages of fuel would disrupt flows of commuters to work-places, learners to school, food from farms to supermarkets, and hamper economic activity.
All aspects of government policy should be underpinned by an expectation of much more expensive and scarcer oil supplies in the future. There is a wide range of policies and measures that can be implemented. The first step should be a comprehensive conservation programme that cuts unnecessary fuel use and raises energy efficiency.
One simple conservation measure is to reduce road speed limits – which will save lives as well as fuel and money. Educate drivers on ways to improve their fuel economy. Carpooling can be encouraged by having dedicated multiple-occupant lanes on city freeways. Various types of fuel rationing could also be considered.
Government support given to the automotive sector should be tied to improved fuel efficiency and incentives for the development and production of electric cars.
The second strategy concerns infrastructure spending.
Rather than widening roads and building new airports, public money would be better spent on more sustainable forms of public transport. The bus rapid transit systems under development in Cape Town and Johannesburg are steps in the right direction, as are safe cycle lanes and cheaper internet bandwidth to support telecommuting.
Our long-neglected railways must be refurbished, extended and electrified. For rail transport systems to be progressively electrified, the country will need to expand its electricity production even more than Eskom is currently planning. This will require huge extra investments in renewable energy such as wind farms and concentrated solar power plants. Such investments will have the additional benefit of creating new ‘green’ jobs.
Agriculture is another sector of the economy that is particularly vulnerable to rising oil prices.
Farmers will need support to cope with rising input costs and to progressively switch over to organic production methods that are not dependent on fossil fuels. A training programme for small-scale and urban farmers is also imperative to promote food security and social stability.
By acknowledging the reality of the imminent peak and decline in global oil production and planning accordingly, our leaders can do much to secure a positive future.
There is much that can be done to mitigate the impacts of oil scarcity, but the longer actions are delayed the more costly and difficult they will be. We need to seize the moment and accelerate the transition to a sustainable economy.
Jeremy Wakeford
Wakeford is an independent consultant specialising in energy, economics and sustainability. He is Chairman of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil South Africa (www.aspo.org.za) and Research Director of the South African New Economics (SANE) Network.
Note that this article has been slightly shortened.
ReplyOtto, May 14, 2010 at 2:11 pm
The ‘call-to-action’ expressed here is founded on no knowledge of the South African fuel market. Here are some facts which will set this poorly informed zealot right.
1. Its not the oil companies that set the price of fuel in South Africa. Its the government that sets the fuel price and in the process extracts up to 45% of every rand you spend on fuel in taxes (76% in the UK). These are meant to go to the Road Accident Fund , road maintenance and a number of other poorly-managed and failing government initiatives. The oil price is set according to a formula which takes into account international oil prices and local needs.
Supply & demand in South Africa has nothing to do with the price of fuel. Its the international oil price fluctuations that determine the price of South African fuel – and its regulated by the South African government.
2. Sasol produces fuel from coal and gas at a far lower cost than fuel produced by using imported crude. But it charges the same for its fuels, again at the price set by the government every month.So it makes more money from each liter than anyone else. Sasol 1&2 were set up using tax payers’ money.This has never been repaid and it still has many historic sweet-heart deals (pipelines, gas,chemicals) which further protect its bottom line.
By all means buy from a company that is ripping off its customers and which has done so for decades – with government approval. Sasol can supply only about 42% of overall South African fuel needs.Excel is a Sasol-owned BEE entity.
3. Sasol is the biggest polluter in the Southern hemisphere and globally is in the top ten.So, buy green by all means but don’t buy Sasol. Buy a bicycle.
4.Engen is owned by the National oil company of Malaysia. To claim that its local is utterly absurd and ill-informed.
5. Why is there no call for boycotts of Caltex and Total? Both are also foreign owned companies.
6. All the oil companies in South Africa buy fuel from each other and then market it under their brand names. The actual fuel you buy from a filling station is in all likelihood been supplied by someone other than the brand you think you are buying. This is purely a logistical way of making fuel available to motorists at the best price- and no boycott can make it go away.
7. The bleeding heart idiot who calls for a boycott does not understand that statistically what she/he calls for is virtually impossible. Regardless of such calls, motorists will fill up when their tank is empty. The company with the best positioned filling station footprint will inevitably get their business regardless of brandname. There may be small local swings, but nationally the need for fuel-on-demand will win out in favour of the best positioned filling station grid. Boycotts simply will not work in this country.
So, Kim Whatever-your-name, get real and wake up. As Richard Nixon was fond of saying, “When they have you by the balls, your heart and mind will follow”
Reply